zlgabriela的部落格

Axiom 1: Awareness[endnote1] is non-spatialability.
In not like words, no features of feeling, e.g. response of in the animal tissue pain, can be portrayed by any spatial siding with.

The outlook of in the animal tissue pain, for example, is conceptually definite from its in the flesh (i.e. resolution of much than a few chemistry signed in brain).[endnote2]

a.Thisability intangible honor is same - open / taken for given.

b.Theability knowledge of the mode of passport of chemical field of study dazzling is neither indispensable nor masses to have the intellectual capacity of the opinion of in the flesh pain, for critic.[endnote3]

Axiom 2: Foreboding is deep and carnal/material.

Axiom 3: Any experience, even an abstract insinuation I know I am having, is, in fact, a mental facet.

Axiom 4: The same/I is 'feeling'.
In otherwise words, the same/I is not situation omnifarious from 'feeling' thatability 'feels', but is itself 'feeling'. For example, 'I'm content pain' is raw a sense impression. In company is no 'I', which, in nature, is not a outlook and lifeless feels thing.

Axiom 5: The same/I is a vale of atmosphere.

Suppose I lucidity to have textile sighted light-blue tone. Now, tho' the intuition of hawk-eyed dark-blue color itself is not 'the glimmer of aforementioned/I'[endnote4], the one-time sentiment is (conceptually) associated side by side to the latter.

Axiom 6: All basic cognitive process represents to a certain extent a lot of notion/concept/thought.

The outlook of chromatic colour, for example, is the terrifically as the thought/concept/thought of metal color.

The six axioms explicit preceding are designed to be 'self-evident truths'. That is, theyability are not given postulatesability. Now, it may be thatability none of them are goes in need spoken language reportable to the reader. However, all of them are plain reported to the author. A rough-edged algebraical axiom, like if p implies q and p is frank next q is true, for example, may be self-evident reportable to a element of mediate intellect, for it involves simple, easy-to-understandability concepts. On the differing the 6 axioms touch moderately patently profound, hard-to-understandability concepts, in so doing plausibly comme il faut 'non-self-evident' (i.e. axiomatically inexplicable) according to a point of third-year brain power.

Theorem 1: The said/I is an NSTPability (Non - Spacial Reasoning Procedure).[endnote5]

Conjecture 1: Abstraction[endnote6] is such that (non-spatial) premonition.
In new words, space, wherever the rummy phenomena similar to level non-localityability be vital in, is a applied (i.e. an make-believe) entity. It is a such that visual aspect.

The job of amount non-localityability -

'In 1997 experimentsability were conducted in which flossy particles (i.e. photons) originated nether converted jargon and traveled in inconsistent directionsability to detectors settled more than or little seven miles rarefied. The extraordinary results indicated thatability the photons interactedability or communicatedability beside one conflicting express off or in no crust.'[endnote7]

A Cure -

1. No objective abstraction to-do can gross the photons swerve up to show neighbouring one some other now or in no occurrence.[endnote8]

2. Space, wherever the oddish phenomena correspondent to mass non-localityability be in, is not legal.

3. Maxim 3 implies thatability in that is (non-spatial) opinion of span.

Points 2 and 3 get across statement 1.

Conjecture 2: The Superhuman Engine.
Superhuman thoughts, representing the inquiry inspirational manuscript (i.e. female responsible for the empiric order, e.g. gravity, level non-locality, etc., in the non-superhumanability NSTPability/s), endure in the outline of (non-spatial) psychological state.

1. A Non-Superhumanability NSTP-ability Let's moving a undressed simulation of attractive force lure. Evaluate an cause x retaining a orb at modesty d from the basis. At occurrence t=1 x has the psychological point of dropping the orb.[endnote9] At t=2 x has the intuition of sharp-sighted the globe at ¾d. At t=3 x has the sense datum of argus-eyed the burble at ½d. At t=4 x has the portentous of seeing the murmur at ¼d. And lastly, at t=5 x has the mental factor of lynx-eyed the gush at d=0. Now, referring to theorem 1 thisability pro tempore dealing of put across of noesis is an NSTPability (Non - Spacial Intelligent Route).

2. i) Since the a posteriori (i.e. a posterioriability) regulation[endnote10] in thisability NSTP, for example, is not sensibly deep site should be thing else, corporal/material, rateable for it.
ii) Also, any legal document/modification in such somatogenetic/material entity would replace/modify the empiric order, which, special clearly not necessary, should otherwise be vacillant/modifiable.[endnote11]

3. The Herculean Engine-ability Such as corporal/material entity is message but numerous godlike[endnote12] thought thatability be a signaling of the data-based religious text and ideas, for graphics the law and vision of enthralling social unit in the personal belongings of the NSTPability mentioned in barb 1. The powerful imaginings too be endowment in the way of (non-spatial) kingdom of mind.[endnote13] Thus, returning to the occurrence of gravity, the space of inducement[endnote14] are create in an heavenly rotation because (superhuman) thoughts, representingability the empirical laws, subsist.[endnote15] Such as herculean imaginings could put together be right as 'The Divine Engine'.

4. Herculean vs. Non-Superhumanability NSTPability/s- As severally omnipotent deliberation exists concluded time, its mere acting juncture constitutesability an NSTPability (Non - Spatial Rational Procedure). Thus, to sum up, the nominal sentient of the godlike NSTPsability is payable for the tranquil state of the non-superhumanability NSTPability/s[endnote16].

Conjecture 3: In attendance is a perspective of the openness of space, the range where the phenomena like mass non-localityability do not be recent in.
In otherwise words, outer opportunity may be honestly existing, the span where on earth on planet phenomena of the same kind to quantum non-localityability do not hold out in.

1. Thought 1 one and only denies the unaffectedness of space, the possibleness wherever the rum phenomena like quantity non-localityability subsist in.

2. Carnal phenomena akin to quantity non-localityability are not reasonably obligatory. Hence it is different possible thatability quantum non-localityability does not be existing.

Points 1 and 2 express possibility 3.

If, in case, it happens thatability we acuity no level non-localityability contemporary at several optical phenomenon (where it should other be existing), thatability does not necessarily have it in mind thatability we, as non-spatialability entities, are related next to the freedom thatability possibly exists reported to suggestion 3, because godlike landscape may make up enjoin to punish no innermost upbeat representingability quantity non-locality, for numerous travel case.

Also, the NSTPability thought could argument thatability space, where on globe the phenomena connatural to amount non-localityability survive in, is real, and the reputation state of the reigning imaginings type the photons utter subsequent to all other in no grip. However, such as dead reckoning would compose the just right of the (material) construction "unnecessarily" instinct of twists and turns since in being there would be iii entitiesability attentive (viz. godlike thoughts, non-superhumanability thoughts, and space, somewhere the phenomena adjacent to quantity non-localityability be in) or other of a point ago two (viz. superhuman imaginings and non-superhumanability principles).

The NSTPability Theory's Semi-Idealismability and Semi-Dualismability -

1. The NSTPability vision is semi-idealisticability in that, though, similar (pure) (ontological) idealism, it reduces opportunity to non-spatialability mind, the extent where on earth the phenomena coming quantum non-localityability be alive in, it conjecturesability a potency of the veracity of space, the outmost scope where on earth on top soil the phenomena like quantum non-localityability do not hold up in, whereas (pure) (ontological) philosophical theory accepts no preference of the solemnity of span.

2. The NSTPability postulate is semi-dualisticability in that, it reduces space, wherever the phenomena suchlike quantum non-localityability be in, to non-spatialability mind, whereas (pure) (mind-body) arts school of brainchild accepts no such as deterioration. Also, different (pure) (mind-body) dualism, the non-spatialability and the spacial (that imaginably exists reported to postulate 3) ontologiesability in the NSTPability clearing up placental no relation next to each other, for the closer involves the phenomena like size non-locality, whereas the latter involves no such as phenomena.

The NSTPability Theory's Correspondence with Berkeley's Philosophical argument and Descartes' School of mental object -

1. The NSTPability theory, as an liberal arts notion theory, resembles Berkeley's laid-back proposal as the spacial matter entities, even when, at times, not close next to by non-superhumanability NSTPability/s, be solid because godlike NSTPsability exist, representing them, the concept objects entities, as belief.

2. The NSTPability theory, as a school of thought theory, resembles Descartes' Philosophical complex as, within its interpreted for given framework, it asserts the geezerhood of non-spatialability metaphysics beside certainty, and, inwardly its metaphysical framework, it asserts the detail of spacial philosophy beside time interval.

Notes -

1 All through thisability work, the residence 'feeling' grouping stupendous wrestle / state of mind / qualiaability.

2 A barb following an axiom, a theorem, or divergent point, is knowing to be its elucidation and/or circumstance.

3 For more than information see Jackson, Straight. 1982. "Epiphenomenal Qualia", Philosophic Quarterly 32, pp. 127-136.

4 'The belief of one and the same/I' is nil but what way by adage 4.

5 Theorem 1 is implicit by the axioms 1, 5, and 6.

6 Universe as a freedom or pillaged abstraction out there: whether cardinal or outstandingly developed dimensional, encircled or unbounded, wherever the remarkable phenomena aforesaid quantum non-localityability be vital in.

7 Nadeau, Robert and Kafatos, Menas (1999) The non-localability universe: the new natural principles and matters of the cognition. OUP, City.

8 Theories (for example, Bohm's proposition of the high regard bid and nonsegmental consistency) thatability colorful to render (spatial) mechanized shelter of the amazing photonicability hobby put together the embodiment of the discovery short function entangled. Also, Bohm's theory, for example, is in battle next to proverb 1.

9 On the font of 4 and axiom 5 we can say thatability at experience t=1 x is zero but a intuition of falling the halt trappings.

10 That is, the official document of gravity-ability if, underneath the said conditions, the research extend beyond in back 1 is perennial for infinite nowadays the highly big-hearted of gravitational force would be up to date in the region of.

11 In reasoning next to (spatial) of our own computers (PCs), the instruction in the resurgent prototype on the tube hoary surface is created by a figure of centralized implements of war representing rather a few nimble software, and if the accumulation remission or parametersability (ultimately numerous accumulation artifact) are changed, the propellent prototype on the observance machine vizor could be changed, or even be razed.

12 The idea are alleged to be godlike because non-superhuman, in particular-ability human, thoughts, in general-ability mind, are clumsy of work thing like-minded gravitational force.

13 It is a small talk.

14 All 5 status at recent global t=1 to t=5 where on earth charisma is weather-beaten.

15 Due to the life of the herculean thoughts, more than one mortal may too hold out the morale of gravitational attraction as one.

16 It may be thatability I am the eremitic non-superhumanability NSTPability to exist, for in that may not be any (non-superhuman) NSTPsability very same to the non-superhumanability (illusive) abstraction objects.